Škoda Enyaq Coupé iV Vor- und Nachteile

Vor- und Nachteile von myEVreview

• excellent interior build quality
• excellent seats RS iV version (unfortunately without cooling)
• very rigid body
• feeling of quality in the interior
• the all-glass roof is beautiful
• comfortable chassis despite large 20 or 21-inch wheels
• good brakes - measured 100-0 km/h - 35,5 m
• high safety rating (5 Euro NCAP stars)
• spacious interior (more space than e.g. ICE Audi Q5)
• excellent turning circle: 9,6 m (slightly worse for 4x4 versions: 10,5 m)
• low interior cabin noise
• door pockets can also hold large 1.5 bottles (also in the rear door)
• powerful regen - saves conventional friction brakes
• charging up to 135 kW, i.e. 200 km of motorway range or 300 km of urban range can be recharged in 30-35 minutes
• good looking car
• natural seating position in the rear - the seats support the thighs well
• sound system is really good
• can tow 1200 to 1400 kg depending on the version
• classic steering wheel buttons (much better solution than touch buttons)
• RS iV 220 kW acceleration to 100 km/h in 6.5 s (measured 6.3 s)
• 4x large, robust bag hooks in the luggage compartment
• boot only 15 litres smaller than the Enyaq iV (570 / 585 l)
• clear, colour head-up display (option)
• well-lit luggage compartment, including the area behind the car (when the fifth door is open)
• 4 window controls in the driver's door (VW ID.3 and ID.4 use an impractical solution with only two buttons)
• highway consumption of 22-23 kWh, i.e. a highway range of over 300 km

• no heat pump by defaut (option)
• Skoda App needs improving
• voice assistant does not understand some basic commands
• no front trunk (frunk)
• lack of heating controls as buttons is annoying
• kerb weight over 2200 kg
• bad design of door handles
• top speed only 160 km/h (electronically limited), RS iV 180 km/h

Sind Sie Besitzer eines Elektrofahrzeugs?
Schreiben Sie Ihre Bewertung